Dear reader, please note that we are told that the viruses that cause acute respiratory illnesses like the common cold & a group called “influenza-like illnesses” (ILI) are supposedly extraordinarily easy to transmit.
Remember the two metre separation rule? Though this has officially been admitted that there is no scientific or empirical basis for it. We were made to queue up outside shops in all weathers.
Recall the installation of Perspex screens in many shops? Surely almost everyone looked at these and thought “How in the world could this prevent an airborne infection?”. Of course it wouldn’t, though this isn’t how these illnesses develop in the first place. They’re not infectious in nature nor are they contagious.
Remember the masking obligation? You do realise that they could even theoretically only have been effective if they filtered the air you breathe in as well as which you exhale? And either the mesh size is huge, so it won’t filter supposedly tiny particles, or the mesh size is very small indeed, so it simply offers an extreme resistance to airflow and you’d suffocate. The air you breathe in & out while wearing such a mask entirely bypasses the mask fabric itself.
Remember “If the masks are good enough for surgeons….”? Did you talk to any surgeons? They don’t wear masks, but splashguards. These prevent them dropping anything into the surgical field. More importantly, they prevent anything from the patient directly squirting into the surgeon’s mouth, nose and eyes, things like blood, pus & bone fragments.
I added these reminders because none of them work or were even intended to work. Their intention was to maintain fear and to force compliance with absurd charades, to teach you that resistance is useless. The authorities didn’t much need to enforce these “guidelines” because the public did it for them.
Yet again, we were given to understand that acute respiratory illnesses & especially “covid19” was extremely contagious. This means, very easy to become infected.
With that backdrop, it ought immediately to strike the critical reader that investigators have tried scores of times to demonstrate, thereafter to characterise, transmission or contagion of symptoms. They’ve tried and failed. Not once, but scores of times. This is extraordinary. If the narrative is true, the hardest thing would be to prevent almost everyone from acquiring the infection.
There are some studies where the investigators claim to have succeeded in demonstrating transmission. In all cases I’ve looked at, they’ve often used a PCR-based diagnostic, which isn’t a valid way to go about it & why would they even need to adopt complicated endpoints? Simply observe whether or not the “recipients” developed symptoms of a cold or the ILI.
The commonplace weakness I’ve seen involves leaving out controls. Controls replicate every part of the study, except they’re not inoculated/challenged with potentially infected material. How any study got past peer review while lacking controls is beyond me. Best practice involves not only incorporating controls, but having a neutral third party to prepare the innoculum and blank controls for that, and code the challenge material employed. That way, both the subjects and the investigators are “blind” to which subject got what challenge. If you know you’ve extensibly been infected, or the converse, the likelihood of distortion of the entire study is both high and unevaluable.
This might amuse you, Mike. In 2021 in a cold damp day in late January or early February, I went to a builder's merchants, Covers, in Chichester. The place was nearly deserted but they had the masks required sign up on the doors.
I went in anyway, and was accosted by an overweight member of staff who insisted I wear a mask. He was not wearing a mask! I asked him about this and he pointed at the Perspex screen at the payment desk and said ‘That’s my mask’.
I didn’t have the energy to argue as I have been struggling with my health so had to wait outside in the cold and damp whilst he got the things I asked for and I paid outside.
In all my life I have never known such stupidity and lack of common sense and consideration.
Factually transmission by low virus concentration doesn't work. Usually our mucosa is powerful enough to shield us.
But SARS-COV-2, as an US army lab virus, has been engineered with adding powerful receptors (from AIDS virus - 1 virus is enough! for infection) and an optimal cleavage sub-chain (optimized receptor passing) that is not present in any natural virus. So we estimate that SARS-COV-2 is at least 1000x more contagious than any other respiratory virus.
I personally treated many people that had air to air transmissions and confirmed (plate test) infections. Only if you understand how this virus works and when/how you must treat it, you will have a fair chance. Best is to prepare yourself with enough V-D3 + zinc.
After infection use 1:10 Betadiene lotion to roll a cotton stick over all your throat and sniff the rest of the iodine through your nostrils. Gargling might work too.
This is what the informed Chinese people did after getting a sore throat. This 1 cent treatment will enhance your survival rate by a factor of 19!
So please forget all fiction of a impossible transmission as with SARS-COV-2 this has completely changed.
As you correctly say:: It's just a claim - usually made by people that have no relevant education or try to attract such people to support other wired claims.
Independent (from Big Pharma money) scientists that understood the nature & origin of the virus never did believe the official pandemic charade but these scientists based all their comments (countering Big Pharma) on a real existent SARS-COV2 virus.
But if there are no viruses, what is the RNA in the vaccines and what the hell are the spikes? No particles from a virus?? The more I read and learn, the less I understand!
I'm not arguing against the thrust if the article, but if indeed transmission does not occur this way, how does one explain it when a class of kindergardeners all come down with a sniffle at the same time? What is the mechanism at play? This a common occurrence that everyone has experience with.
It’s not the scientific method to be in any way obligated to answer questions that arise when taking down a false narrative.
I challenge your assertion that all the kids get sick, anyway. But even if you are right, it doesn’t trump the extensive literature showing that attempted transmission does not occur.
In response to this realisation, we are collectively obligated to think of new explanations. Even if there are no explanations forthcoming that you find acceptable, it doesn’t overrule the formal failures to demonstrate transmission.
It’s important to undertake this distinction. Human desire for apparently easy certainty is a huge trap.
The symptoms are not the illness but the natural healing symptoms of our body trying to expel toxins which are the cause of being ill.
Sniffles, flu, skin rash, pimples, diarrhea, vomiting and more are all ways (behavior) of the body to detox and some of these seem to be contagious, just like laughing or smiling which are not transmissible.
Menstruation moments of woman living together are also said to sync up.
.
The mechanism for sniffles and Flu is AFAIK still unknown. Pheromones and exosomes are possible candidates I know of. Some dogs are said to be able to smell if someone is ill.
Dear Dr Mike Yaddon, you have done it again: created a stir in the duck pond and with common sense and loving reasons, thank you if anyone I consider to be trustworthy and honest, and you claim not to know everything, but I am humbled by the knowledge you process and share. Your honesty earns you respect, and everyone will love you for it. I had the mindset before this pandemic that no virus that makes me sick has ever been proven. This attitude has made my work as a naturopath/Heilpraktiker extremely difficult, even among colleagues. You have had quite an 'alternative' opinion about that and the whole disease system, and shaming is not unknown to me either. Being at a lecture and asking such 'alternative' questions rarely goes down well with the many. But since I know from experience that it is rarely or almost never the many who hold the truth, they live on mantras of lies without walking the globe. I am grateful to you for your contribution to bringing truth to this insanity because it is what it is if you ask me. I have shared your views and your understanding and annoyance at the world that is at the door right now, from the point of view that the population are easy victims because they do not take responsibility for their own lives and well-being. Thanks, Mike. Hugs from a friend, Cliff
Mark Playne is a good friend of mine because we share life views and physical mysteries. Science is a tool by which we have shaped this planet. One can use this tool in all manner of ways. For so long, we have viewed the tool of science in an egotistical manner, thinking we must control what is around us, causing us to lose sight of the larger picture and resulting in an asynchronous flow with the universe. This technology's purpose seems to suggest a shift in perspective from the egotistical to the universal. There is a fundamental intelligence/geometry at play within the vacuum of creation, and when we align our perspective with this, we realign with universal thought. In this manner, science can now work synchronously with the universe, resulting in harmony with our environment.
"We are one at the root - we just part at the branch" - Rasheed Ogunlaru
Learn how we are literally all connected by studying the physics of the universe: enroll in the free Unified Science Course in the Resonance Academy at ResonanceScience.org
I currently live in Denmark, but we, my wife Birthe and the undersigned, are pulling up tent poles and want to seek freedom if it exists somewhere on the planet. One of my FB platforms has been started under the pandemic, "Gå For Friheden I Kærlighed Til Biologien," in order to educate a population that believes. Transmission failure has been so obvious to me in my work, but almost impossible to get people to accept as with virus claims.
Also - Alford RH, Kasel JA, Gerone PJ, Knight V. Human influenza resulting from aerosol inhalation, Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 1966, vol. 122 (pg. 800-4) - found "Of 11 volunteers with antibodies of 1 in 20 or less who had received between 1 and 5 TCD50 of virus, 6 developed an antibody rise-5 with virus excretion as well (4 of these were clinically ill)."
Controls would have been as identical as possible to the test group, and would have been sham inoculated using material indistinguishable from the ostensibly infectious material. This kind of control is essential in order to blind both the subjects and the investigators.
At one time measles. Small pox, chicken pox, rubella were all called ‘small pox’
They are clinically indistinguishable.
One method of elimination is via the skin. Elimination so dramatic means heavy toxins / anxiety and low nutrition
So some die, especially with medical ‘help’
What many are looking for is evidence that any of these diseases exist?
Nobody would say “Ah! you have damp in the kitchen, one of the downstairs light switches is dodgy and you have to rattle the key to get in the front door. Your house has Goinohabian’s syndrome - it can be transferred asymptomatically via human agent. Have you been to any houses with Goinohabian’s syndrome recently?”
Interesting. Never heard of it. The rebranding of poxes doesn't surprise me. I now know that this is what happened to polio. Defined and rebranded out of existence.
Late to the party on this thread, sorry. Am I correct in remembering that Polio 'vaccines' in the UK in the late 1950s and early 1960s were contaminated with SV-40 (Simian Virus 40) - a supposed cancer accelerator?
If a contaminant, how did it get in there?
If not a contaminant, then it was designed to be in there? Another experiment on an unwitting population?
There is 'form' there, I would suggest, particularly in view of what we have all experienced since Q4 2019. (I'd like back my old parallel universe from that time period please. I don't much like this new one into which I was involuntarily thrust).
Why didn’t Pfizer test for transmission of Covid before releasing the vaccine? Because, there is no virus, no transmission and no contagion. That’s impossible!! Case in point.
June 24th 2024 They're going to vaccinate all animals on Earth and poison them as protection against non-existent and non-transmissable "diseases". That have not proven causation, nor transmission nor contagion of “Foot And Mouth” Disease. Over 90% animals vaccinated for Foot And Mouth. Read more at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/111215355.cms
NIH: No Proof Of Contagion of "Foot and Mouth Disease". A fundamental conundrum remains in the discordance between the detection of infectious FMDV in carriers and the apparent lack of contagiousness to in-contact animals. Although substantial progress has been made in elucidating the causal mechanisms of persistent FMDV infection, there are still critical knowledge gaps that need to be addressed in order to elucidate, predict, prevent, and model the risks associated with the carrier state. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7157498/
NIH: No Proof Of Transmission of "Foot and Mouth Disease". They had to inject animals with some unknown poison to claim they were "infected"; not "contagion" nor "transmisson" by being nearby, fluids or aerisols. Naive cattle were inoculated through intranasopharyngeal deposition of unprocessed OPF samples that had been collected from FMDV carriers at 30 days postinfection. These inoculated cattle developed clinical FMD, and the severity of disease they developed was similar to that of animals that had been infected with a high-titer inoculum. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135961/
Great No-Virus Debate w/ Dr Andrew Kaufman & Steve Kirsch ft Covid Virus never isolated. 56 Million Gene Sequences made-up in Computer (AI) Simulation. Then, turned into a Synthetic Vaccine in 3 days. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/great-no-virus-debate-w-dr-andrew
UK Govt would NEVER vaccinate the beef herd against F&M..... because then they would test positive for the antibody (if such exists) and hence make the UK Beef herd worthless on the export meat markets, particularly within the €USSR.
That didn't stop them using that twat Neil Ferguson's 'modelling' to all but exterminate the UK Beef herd in 2001. I am absolutely certain that that was the intention. When you look at various activities and incidents over the last 25 years, many of them seem to have been geared towards destroying food supply....
..... and I'd still like to know WTF was behind all those mysterious unsolicited mailings of seed packets from China in Q2/Q3 of 2020. That was cursorily dismissed as a 'brushing' scam to inflate positive reviews for fictitious purchases from Chinese company internet sales, but...... what if...... what if those packets had GMO seeds in them that were engineered to wipe out reproducible native plant species and replace them with aggressive but impotent (past perhaps one generation) new species? The resulting famine(s) would be a good depopulation strategem, wouldn't it?
Of course, that would just be a worthless conspiracy theory.....
No good. They’re using invalid tests to track the apparent movement of a virus,
But what they’re is watching the false positives & claiming it’s proof of transmission.
This is why I emphasise “symptomatic transmission”.
Set aside indirect tests which as you know are fiercely criticised.
Look only at studies where the endpoint is symptoms of acute respiratory illnesses, scored by an independent observer, blinded to the treatment arm each person is in.
Oh, and there must be controls. Often there aren’t any or design is inadequate.
...be interesting (if at all possible) to log incidence of various diseases (particularly cancers?) by year for (say) the period twenty years before the advent of 'Radio' in 1922 to the present.
Consider how much RF energy is passing through peoples bodies now, compared to 1921?
You allude to that with your selection of key dates, but it would be enlightening to see those detailed graphs <per disease> ? I would wager that incidences have GREATLY increased decade upon decade and probably year on year (assisted - accelerated even? - by the intervention of commercial Pharmaceuticals). A crossplot against Big Pharma profits may be equally enlightening?
Don't forget the maxim of Big Pharma : "A Patient cured is a Customer lost".
Dear reader, please note that we are told that the viruses that cause acute respiratory illnesses like the common cold & a group called “influenza-like illnesses” (ILI) are supposedly extraordinarily easy to transmit.
Remember the two metre separation rule? Though this has officially been admitted that there is no scientific or empirical basis for it. We were made to queue up outside shops in all weathers.
Recall the installation of Perspex screens in many shops? Surely almost everyone looked at these and thought “How in the world could this prevent an airborne infection?”. Of course it wouldn’t, though this isn’t how these illnesses develop in the first place. They’re not infectious in nature nor are they contagious.
Remember the masking obligation? You do realise that they could even theoretically only have been effective if they filtered the air you breathe in as well as which you exhale? And either the mesh size is huge, so it won’t filter supposedly tiny particles, or the mesh size is very small indeed, so it simply offers an extreme resistance to airflow and you’d suffocate. The air you breathe in & out while wearing such a mask entirely bypasses the mask fabric itself.
Remember “If the masks are good enough for surgeons….”? Did you talk to any surgeons? They don’t wear masks, but splashguards. These prevent them dropping anything into the surgical field. More importantly, they prevent anything from the patient directly squirting into the surgeon’s mouth, nose and eyes, things like blood, pus & bone fragments.
I added these reminders because none of them work or were even intended to work. Their intention was to maintain fear and to force compliance with absurd charades, to teach you that resistance is useless. The authorities didn’t much need to enforce these “guidelines” because the public did it for them.
Yet again, we were given to understand that acute respiratory illnesses & especially “covid19” was extremely contagious. This means, very easy to become infected.
With that backdrop, it ought immediately to strike the critical reader that investigators have tried scores of times to demonstrate, thereafter to characterise, transmission or contagion of symptoms. They’ve tried and failed. Not once, but scores of times. This is extraordinary. If the narrative is true, the hardest thing would be to prevent almost everyone from acquiring the infection.
There are some studies where the investigators claim to have succeeded in demonstrating transmission. In all cases I’ve looked at, they’ve often used a PCR-based diagnostic, which isn’t a valid way to go about it & why would they even need to adopt complicated endpoints? Simply observe whether or not the “recipients” developed symptoms of a cold or the ILI.
The commonplace weakness I’ve seen involves leaving out controls. Controls replicate every part of the study, except they’re not inoculated/challenged with potentially infected material. How any study got past peer review while lacking controls is beyond me. Best practice involves not only incorporating controls, but having a neutral third party to prepare the innoculum and blank controls for that, and code the challenge material employed. That way, both the subjects and the investigators are “blind” to which subject got what challenge. If you know you’ve extensibly been infected, or the converse, the likelihood of distortion of the entire study is both high and unevaluable.
This might amuse you, Mike. In 2021 in a cold damp day in late January or early February, I went to a builder's merchants, Covers, in Chichester. The place was nearly deserted but they had the masks required sign up on the doors.
I went in anyway, and was accosted by an overweight member of staff who insisted I wear a mask. He was not wearing a mask! I asked him about this and he pointed at the Perspex screen at the payment desk and said ‘That’s my mask’.
I didn’t have the energy to argue as I have been struggling with my health so had to wait outside in the cold and damp whilst he got the things I asked for and I paid outside.
In all my life I have never known such stupidity and lack of common sense and consideration.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/long-stupid?utm_source=publication-search
Factually transmission by low virus concentration doesn't work. Usually our mucosa is powerful enough to shield us.
But SARS-COV-2, as an US army lab virus, has been engineered with adding powerful receptors (from AIDS virus - 1 virus is enough! for infection) and an optimal cleavage sub-chain (optimized receptor passing) that is not present in any natural virus. So we estimate that SARS-COV-2 is at least 1000x more contagious than any other respiratory virus.
I personally treated many people that had air to air transmissions and confirmed (plate test) infections. Only if you understand how this virus works and when/how you must treat it, you will have a fair chance. Best is to prepare yourself with enough V-D3 + zinc.
After infection use 1:10 Betadiene lotion to roll a cotton stick over all your throat and sniff the rest of the iodine through your nostrils. Gargling might work too.
This is what the informed Chinese people did after getting a sore throat. This 1 cent treatment will enhance your survival rate by a factor of 19!
So please forget all fiction of a impossible transmission as with SARS-COV-2 this has completely changed.
What do you make of the claim that SARS-C2 has never been isolated?
As you correctly say:: It's just a claim - usually made by people that have no relevant education or try to attract such people to support other wired claims.
Independent (from Big Pharma money) scientists that understood the nature & origin of the virus never did believe the official pandemic charade but these scientists based all their comments (countering Big Pharma) on a real existent SARS-COV2 virus.
Ha Ha. You are funny. Do the ‘climate change emergency is real’ next.
Chat bots are not allowed on redit/substack!
Please provide one, excellent paper on “isolation of SARS-CoV-2”.
An original research article, please. Not a media report.
Thank you.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
from 03.02.2020
I’m going to assume you mean well.
That assumption won’t hold if you do no research.
The Fan Wu?
Seriously!
How often has that paper in particular been eviscerated?
You are VERY VERY NEW to all of this.
That paper is dealt with for example extensively in these 5 hours.
Part 1
https://drsambailey.com/resources/videos/viruses-unplugged/a-farewell-to-virology-part-one/
Part 2 in
https://open.substack.com/pub/drsambailey/p/a-farewell-to-virology-part-two-dr
Part 3
https://open.substack.com/pub/drsambailey/p/a-farewell-to-virology-part-3-drw
Then what the heck is going on? How are people getting sick? And in the case of chicken pox or measles showing the same symptoms.
But if there are no viruses, what is the RNA in the vaccines and what the hell are the spikes? No particles from a virus?? The more I read and learn, the less I understand!
ReginaH
They’ve made claims but not experimentally confirmed any of them.
Thank you, Tim, for bringing this together.
To all the individual contributors who painstakingly compiled numerous publications, thank you also.
Please post other studies in the comments.
Thank you gentlemen. Great resource for this coming fall.
Hi Mike, There is no battle greater won than the defence of Humanity verses the Almighty Dollar $. RR
Agree, if virus transmission was a thing then everyone using the underground on a daily basis would be permanently sick or dead
Daniel Roytas has also published a book, Can You Catch a Cold?, after reviewing >200 studies and finding zero scientific evidence on contagion!
I also have several FOI responses from the CDC, etc on the topic - resulting in zero scientific evidence:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/freedom-of-information-responses-re-contagion/
Also, see
Evidence against the alleged contagion of Scarlet Fever:
https://aldhissla.substack.com/p/the-infectious-myth-busted-is-scarlet
Evidence against the alleged contagion of the plague:
https://aldhissla.substack.com/p/the-infectious-myth-busted-is-plague
Will include
An other nice addition:
Scientists tried to give people COVID - and failed
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01284-1
Without paywall https://archive.is/qfGvA
I'm not arguing against the thrust if the article, but if indeed transmission does not occur this way, how does one explain it when a class of kindergardeners all come down with a sniffle at the same time? What is the mechanism at play? This a common occurrence that everyone has experience with.
It’s important to separate things.
It’s not the scientific method to be in any way obligated to answer questions that arise when taking down a false narrative.
I challenge your assertion that all the kids get sick, anyway. But even if you are right, it doesn’t trump the extensive literature showing that attempted transmission does not occur.
In response to this realisation, we are collectively obligated to think of new explanations. Even if there are no explanations forthcoming that you find acceptable, it doesn’t overrule the formal failures to demonstrate transmission.
It’s important to undertake this distinction. Human desire for apparently easy certainty is a huge trap.
Plenty dealing with that. Check @Dawn Lester for a start. There’s a link in the article.
In short
Common exposure
Common anxiety
The symptoms are not the illness but the natural healing symptoms of our body trying to expel toxins which are the cause of being ill.
Sniffles, flu, skin rash, pimples, diarrhea, vomiting and more are all ways (behavior) of the body to detox and some of these seem to be contagious, just like laughing or smiling which are not transmissible.
Menstruation moments of woman living together are also said to sync up.
.
The mechanism for sniffles and Flu is AFAIK still unknown. Pheromones and exosomes are possible candidates I know of. Some dogs are said to be able to smell if someone is ill.
Dear Dr Mike Yaddon, you have done it again: created a stir in the duck pond and with common sense and loving reasons, thank you if anyone I consider to be trustworthy and honest, and you claim not to know everything, but I am humbled by the knowledge you process and share. Your honesty earns you respect, and everyone will love you for it. I had the mindset before this pandemic that no virus that makes me sick has ever been proven. This attitude has made my work as a naturopath/Heilpraktiker extremely difficult, even among colleagues. You have had quite an 'alternative' opinion about that and the whole disease system, and shaming is not unknown to me either. Being at a lecture and asking such 'alternative' questions rarely goes down well with the many. But since I know from experience that it is rarely or almost never the many who hold the truth, they live on mantras of lies without walking the globe. I am grateful to you for your contribution to bringing truth to this insanity because it is what it is if you ask me. I have shared your views and your understanding and annoyance at the world that is at the door right now, from the point of view that the population are easy victims because they do not take responsibility for their own lives and well-being. Thanks, Mike. Hugs from a friend, Cliff
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/q4uj3U1bK3npoxuC/
Some links and a little explanation:
This link will lead to one of the platforms I have shared on. I often share on Not On The Beeb: https://www.facebook.com/share/p/URAQxXUSZp56SPme/
Mark Playne is a good friend of mine because we share life views and physical mysteries. Science is a tool by which we have shaped this planet. One can use this tool in all manner of ways. For so long, we have viewed the tool of science in an egotistical manner, thinking we must control what is around us, causing us to lose sight of the larger picture and resulting in an asynchronous flow with the universe. This technology's purpose seems to suggest a shift in perspective from the egotistical to the universal. There is a fundamental intelligence/geometry at play within the vacuum of creation, and when we align our perspective with this, we realign with universal thought. In this manner, science can now work synchronously with the universe, resulting in harmony with our environment.
"We are one at the root - we just part at the branch" - Rasheed Ogunlaru
Learn how we are literally all connected by studying the physics of the universe: enroll in the free Unified Science Course in the Resonance Academy at ResonanceScience.org
Art from the Wurzel Atlas
Cliff Lind Hjulskov, Denmark
Link to “The Connected Universe” movie here;
PHYSICIST https://youtu.be/o4uY4hyBh9k.
I currently live in Denmark, but we, my wife Birthe and the undersigned, are pulling up tent poles and want to seek freedom if it exists somewhere on the planet. One of my FB platforms has been started under the pandemic, "Gå For Friheden I Kærlighed Til Biologien," in order to educate a population that believes. Transmission failure has been so obvious to me in my work, but almost impossible to get people to accept as with virus claims.
Best wishes
Cliff
Thank you, Cliff. I only just saw your kind & informative post.
Study #51 - though uncontrolled with respect to disease transmission - shows efficacy of disease transmission: " Seven in each group became ill ..."
Ha ha
????
Also - Alford RH, Kasel JA, Gerone PJ, Knight V. Human influenza resulting from aerosol inhalation, Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 1966, vol. 122 (pg. 800-4) - found "Of 11 volunteers with antibodies of 1 in 20 or less who had received between 1 and 5 TCD50 of virus, 6 developed an antibody rise-5 with virus excretion as well (4 of these were clinically ill)."
‘Antibodies’
Right
So - these totally non-specific secondary markers convince you that something was being measured?
You don’t mind that an entirely fictitious ‘virus’ is invented to ‘explain’ a proof of the existence of contagion?
"4 of these were clinically ill"
How many of the controls became clinically ill?
Controls would have been as identical as possible to the test group, and would have been sham inoculated using material indistinguishable from the ostensibly infectious material. This kind of control is essential in order to blind both the subjects and the investigators.
Here is another Study - Hall et al on RSV transmission - described here:
https://journals.lww.com/pidj/fulltext/2000/10001/transmission_of_viral_respiratory_infections_in.2.aspx
Study found that transmission of RSV from symptomatic infants to nurses was determined by the type of contact with the infant.
DPL003 seems to have removed his account. I found a copy of "Virology - The Damning Evidence" at https://archive.is/4Xs1d and made a copy of it at https://telegra.ph/Disease-transmission-experiments-all-failed-list-09-09.
.
More (not all) of his work can be found at https://archive.is/dpl003.substack.com
So what IS measles, for instance, if not a virus, and why did so many for so long get sick from it?
At one time measles. Small pox, chicken pox, rubella were all called ‘small pox’
They are clinically indistinguishable.
One method of elimination is via the skin. Elimination so dramatic means heavy toxins / anxiety and low nutrition
So some die, especially with medical ‘help’
What many are looking for is evidence that any of these diseases exist?
Nobody would say “Ah! you have damp in the kitchen, one of the downstairs light switches is dodgy and you have to rattle the key to get in the front door. Your house has Goinohabian’s syndrome - it can be transferred asymptomatically via human agent. Have you been to any houses with Goinohabian’s syndrome recently?”
Interesting. Never heard of it. The rebranding of poxes doesn't surprise me. I now know that this is what happened to polio. Defined and rebranded out of existence.
Exactly.
Late to the party on this thread, sorry. Am I correct in remembering that Polio 'vaccines' in the UK in the late 1950s and early 1960s were contaminated with SV-40 (Simian Virus 40) - a supposed cancer accelerator?
If a contaminant, how did it get in there?
If not a contaminant, then it was designed to be in there? Another experiment on an unwitting population?
There is 'form' there, I would suggest, particularly in view of what we have all experienced since Q4 2019. (I'd like back my old parallel universe from that time period please. I don't much like this new one into which I was involuntarily thrust).
Why didn’t Pfizer test for transmission of Covid before releasing the vaccine? Because, there is no virus, no transmission and no contagion. That’s impossible!! Case in point.
June 24th 2024 They're going to vaccinate all animals on Earth and poison them as protection against non-existent and non-transmissable "diseases". That have not proven causation, nor transmission nor contagion of “Foot And Mouth” Disease. Over 90% animals vaccinated for Foot And Mouth. Read more at: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/111215355.cms
NIH: No Proof Of Contagion of "Foot and Mouth Disease". A fundamental conundrum remains in the discordance between the detection of infectious FMDV in carriers and the apparent lack of contagiousness to in-contact animals. Although substantial progress has been made in elucidating the causal mechanisms of persistent FMDV infection, there are still critical knowledge gaps that need to be addressed in order to elucidate, predict, prevent, and model the risks associated with the carrier state. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7157498/
NIH: No Proof Of Transmission of "Foot and Mouth Disease". They had to inject animals with some unknown poison to claim they were "infected"; not "contagion" nor "transmisson" by being nearby, fluids or aerisols. Naive cattle were inoculated through intranasopharyngeal deposition of unprocessed OPF samples that had been collected from FMDV carriers at 30 days postinfection. These inoculated cattle developed clinical FMD, and the severity of disease they developed was similar to that of animals that had been infected with a high-titer inoculum. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6135961/
Great No-Virus Debate w/ Dr Andrew Kaufman & Steve Kirsch ft Covid Virus never isolated. 56 Million Gene Sequences made-up in Computer (AI) Simulation. Then, turned into a Synthetic Vaccine in 3 days. https://nuremberg2.substack.com/p/great-no-virus-debate-w-dr-andrew
UK Govt would NEVER vaccinate the beef herd against F&M..... because then they would test positive for the antibody (if such exists) and hence make the UK Beef herd worthless on the export meat markets, particularly within the €USSR.
That didn't stop them using that twat Neil Ferguson's 'modelling' to all but exterminate the UK Beef herd in 2001. I am absolutely certain that that was the intention. When you look at various activities and incidents over the last 25 years, many of them seem to have been geared towards destroying food supply....
..... and I'd still like to know WTF was behind all those mysterious unsolicited mailings of seed packets from China in Q2/Q3 of 2020. That was cursorily dismissed as a 'brushing' scam to inflate positive reviews for fictitious purchases from Chinese company internet sales, but...... what if...... what if those packets had GMO seeds in them that were engineered to wipe out reproducible native plant species and replace them with aggressive but impotent (past perhaps one generation) new species? The resulting famine(s) would be a good depopulation strategem, wouldn't it?
Of course, that would just be a worthless conspiracy theory.....
Dear Mike, how come you are liking DPL who listed you among his controlled opposition? Correct me please if I missed something.
Pass
https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(22)00467-4/fulltext
No good. They’re using invalid tests to track the apparent movement of a virus,
But what they’re is watching the false positives & claiming it’s proof of transmission.
This is why I emphasise “symptomatic transmission”.
Set aside indirect tests which as you know are fiercely criticised.
Look only at studies where the endpoint is symptoms of acute respiratory illnesses, scored by an independent observer, blinded to the treatment arm each person is in.
Oh, and there must be controls. Often there aren’t any or design is inadequate.
...be interesting (if at all possible) to log incidence of various diseases (particularly cancers?) by year for (say) the period twenty years before the advent of 'Radio' in 1922 to the present.
Consider how much RF energy is passing through peoples bodies now, compared to 1921?
You allude to that with your selection of key dates, but it would be enlightening to see those detailed graphs <per disease> ? I would wager that incidences have GREATLY increased decade upon decade and probably year on year (assisted - accelerated even? - by the intervention of commercial Pharmaceuticals). A crossplot against Big Pharma profits may be equally enlightening?
Don't forget the maxim of Big Pharma : "A Patient cured is a Customer lost".