163 Comments
User's avatar
APT's avatar

The biggest lie?

No it is not 6 million, it is nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons do not exist other than conventional explosives laced with neclear power waste. When you realise the truth of that statement your world view will be turned upside down.

It is very easy to explain: There is no explosion, no expanding gases. Expanding gases is what propelled the canonball and 'fires' the bullet. It really is that simple.

If you propel (using conventional explosive) one lump of metal at another and this does produce a chain reaction releasing enormous amounts of energy, i.e. heat, what does this do? It may vapourise the bomb casing but little else, it cannot vapourise air, it did not turn the ground to glass or even destroy the trees at hiroshima which grew back. It did not vapourise the building under ground zero or the masonary built bank nearby. Hiroshima was fire bombed which destroyed wood and paper built houses exactly the same as it did to Tokyo. All subsequent tests were fake too.

Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I agree with you that there are no nuclear fission bombs. That means the Cuban missile crisis, the first strike simulation tape “accidentally played in 1979” and operation Able Archer were all PsyOps, with multiple objectives.

1. These terrified the general public worldwide and still do today.

2. I think this tells us that the world hasn’t been multipolar since the early sixties (and possibly earlier), which if true makes what’s allegedly happening in the Straits of Hormuz rather different than we might otherwise think.

Sara's avatar

Surely more and more people can see through the sadistic behaviour of the political class in operation for so long.

What we are going through is even bigger than people think - the shattering of the world of illusions, and those who have been peddling it cannot stop it which is showing their true faces.

They will get what's coming to them and they know it.

Questions questions questions's avatar

Politicians haven't been in charge for decades. Some ultra power is pulling the strings for evil gains.

Friar Tuck's avatar

Thought Niko?

Nuclear bombs are impossible not least of all because the physics is nonsense. Essentially the calculations of the energy come from Einstein's famous E = mc² equation, where E is the output energy, m is the rest mass and c² is the speed of light squared. Leaving aside whether it is possible to measure the speed of light at all, Einstein's theories of Special and General Relativity are pure fantasy.

Einstein was first and foremost a plagiarist and a useful tool of the powers that be. His mentor was Hermann Minkowski, a mathematician and fantasist who was the man behind the ludicrous concept of spacetime.

Special Relativity has been debunked by many, including Herbert Dingle in his book 'Science at the Crossroads' which is well worth reading. It's available on Amazon - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Science-at-Crossroads-Herbert-Dingle/dp/0856160601/.

He was a leading proponent of the theory of Special Relativity and was considered an expert in the field. He knew Einstein personally as well as leading physicists like Max Born, who was a close associate of Minkowski in the early days when these clowns were devising their fantastical mathematical models of reality.

Dingle woke up one day and realized there was a serious flaw in the theory. Read the book to find out what the question was.

Einstein invented SR for two reasons

1 To save the fake Maxwell equations concerning the propagation of electromagnetic waves through the ether (Maxwell considered the ether real)

2 To explain why the Michelson-Morley experiments, which were designed to detect the motion of the earth around the Sun, failed to yield the expected result. Physicists had fully expected them to detect the ether wind as the Earth moved through space, but they failed to discover any difference in the speed of light traveling orthogonally to one another through the ether. They were baffled.

Einstein's theory of SR made the entire problem disappear. He claimed the reason the Earth's motion around the sun could not be measured is because everything is relative and in ALL frames of motion the speed of light in a vacuum is constant. He simply decreed this to be so with no proof whatsoever. He used the Lorentz-Poincare transformations in his equations to justify this. The consequence of course was space contraction and time dilation. When Lorentz devised the equation he did so to explain the null result produced by the Michelson-Morley experiments in the late 1880s and the ether was somehow responsible for this dilation of time and contraction of length. He fully accepted it was unsatisfactory and he was waiting for someone to come up with a satisfactory solution.

Einstein simply took what Lorentz had done, stating the speed of light is constant and space is EMPTY, and hey presto. Zero proof. Simply made up.

Out of this nonsense, we have the theory of the nuclear atom, black holes, white holes blah blah blah, and the modern state of physics today. Just look at the Hadron collider and the billions of euros they have sucked out of the taxpayer with ZERO benefit for humanity. Do you think just virology is fake? Nope, virtually every aspect of physics and the other hard sciences has been corrupted.

It's all nonsense but it was deliberately fostered by the powers that be so that when they launch the fake alien invasion you will believe it.

By the way  here is what Tesla had to say about the racist Einstein

“Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles, and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.”

Sara's avatar

Hope so, have heard it several times Einstein wasn't what we have been led to believe, part of the same society of liars.

Friar Tuck's avatar

Thought Niko?

Nuclear bombs are impossible not least of all because the physics is nonsense. Essentially the calculations of the energy come from Einstein's famous E = mc² equation, where E is the output energy, m is the rest mass and c² is the speed of light squared. Leaving aside whether it is possible to measure the speed of light at all, Einstein's theories of Special and General Relativity are pure fantasy.

Einstein was first and foremost a plagiarist and a useful tool of the powers that be. His mentor was Hermann Minkowski, a mathematician and fantasist who was the man behind the ludicrous concept of spacetime.

Special Relativity has been debunked by many, including Herbert Dingle in his book 'Science at the Crossroads' which is well worth reading. It's available on Amazon - https://www.amazon.co.uk/Science-at-Crossroads-Herbert-Dingle/dp/0856160601/.

He was a leading proponent of the theory of Special Relativity and was considered an expert in the field. He knew Einstein personally as well as leading physicists like Max Born, who was a close associate of Minkowski in the early days when these clowns were devising their fantastical mathematical models of reality.

Dingle woke up one day and realized there was a serious flaw in the theory. Read the book to find out what the question was.

Einstein invented SR for two reasons

1 To save the fake Maxwell equations concerning the propagation of electromagnetic waves through the ether (Maxwell considered the ether real)

2 To explain why the Michelson-Morley experiments, which were designed to detect the motion of the earth around the Sun, failed to yield the expected result. Physicists had fully expected them to detect the ether wind as the Earth moved through space, but they failed to discover any difference in the speed of light traveling orthogonally to one another through the ether. They were baffled.

Einstein's theory of SR made the entire problem disappear. He claimed the reason the Earth's motion around the sun could not be measured is because everything is relative and in ALL frames of motion the speed of light in a vacuum is constant. He simply decreed this to be so with no proof whatsoever. He used the Lorentz-Poincare transformations in his equations to justify this. The consequence of course was space contraction and time dilation. When Lorentz devised the equation he did so to explain the null result produced by the Michelson-Morley experiments in the late 1880s and the ether was somehow responsible for this dilation of time and contraction of length. He fully accepted it was unsatisfactory and he was waiting for someone to come up with a satisfactory solution.

Einstein simply took what Lorentz had done, stating the speed of light is constant and space is EMPTY, and hey presto. Zero proof. Simply made up.

Out of this nonsense, we have the theory of the nuclear atom, black holes, white holes blah blah blah, and the modern state of physics today. Just look at the Hadron collider and the billions of euros they have sucked out of the taxpayer with ZERO benefit for humanity. Do you think just virology is fake? Nope, virtually every aspect of physics and the other hard sciences has been corrupted.

It's all nonsense but it was deliberately fostered by the powers that be so that when they launch the fake alien invasion you will believe it.

By the way  here is what Tesla had to say about the racist Einstein

“Einstein's relativity work is a magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles, and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king... its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.”

Lee Turner's avatar

Nice information, interesting. Thankyou.

David Webster's avatar

Seen it reported twice (CA Fitts being one) that Hormuz was closed by the insurance companies, as they were unwilling to provide cover, before Iran took any action. Wonder whose side they are on and who pulled their strings?

Pippi Smythe's avatar

Bingo

Maria DiSalvo's avatar

https://www.bitchute.com/video/d8PesvAWaJgl/

If you want to see Fake News, watch this film taken in Syria. The filmed footage ends up on CNN 3 months later. The film was taken to the UN…crickets.

Ruth Welsh's avatar

Doesn't allow U.K to watch government illegal corporation blocked bitchute.

Ger's avatar

Wars for many decennia prior were contrived for one reason or another, greed and killing and destruction that can be profited from are all bonuses for the conspirators (Rothschilds, Rockefellers, UN, WHO, WEF etc. and their cabal of Mossad agents and captured media/governments/banking systems). The world wars were designed to push an agenda, culminating in now (and the formation of the State of Israel). The fake nukes and collapse of the illusory financial system will very probably destroy a certain mosque where they want to rebuild a temple for their dark messiah. With the world gripped in fear, fuel shortages and perhaps a fake alien invasion or plandemic 2, it’ll be a great opportunity for the great reset and the preplanned solution has been built over many years (just like the toxic fake vaccines) - CBDCs and digital IDs will be embraced by the lazy fearful sheeple who will worship big daddy government for lying to them again. It won’t be long before more culling starts, perhaps a major war in Europe - prior form there is very strong, or blame a mystery virus on the 5G/EMF/RF radiation induced illness/deaths. Jabs will be needed for that fake virus, diagnosed by fraudulent PCR AND COMPLIANCE in taking lethal injections will be needed to keep CBDCs, freedoms and UBI (at least until the recipients sudden death). Damn, the mid term future looks grim.

ellie's avatar

Its all a lie. History especialy.

Truth Seeker's avatar

As you point out with evidence, there is no fission bomb. There are scatter bombs with radioactive isotope payloads. There is fear mongering and unfortunately it is very effective. Appears that "meningitis" has won the competition for next "virus" fear fest.

Inflammation of the meninges is real. Definitely not "viral" likely bacterial.

JayJay's avatar

I always laugh when these weapons of mass destruction are paraded through cities on special events. No safety measures applied and what could go possibly wrong?

Randje's avatar

No nukes is the military version of no viruses, methinks.

APT's avatar

If there were an explosion, i.e. expanding gases we would have nuclear rockets. The only ones I have seen proposed have been based on using the heat to turn water into steam. i.e an expanding gas. Is this why later tests were done under water?

Maria DiSalvo's avatar

I twitted something similar from an engineer source in France to ask the question,

Is this the Sum of All Fears?

I left links to the source looking for opinions, but was immediately taken down for the 3rd and final time; never to get my account back. So it is interesting that you are now allowed to say this here….

As far as Iran goes, IMO, it's about money laundering.

Look into the usvsst fund, the Billions going to Iran every year until the year, 2039. Who was the special master? What other victim funds did he represent as Special Master?

FOLLOW THE MONEY!!

Look at the GAO report from 2016-2023, regarding the usvsst fund. $2.8B was dispersed in January, the largest single dispersement, so far. This dispersement is supposedly for the f*ke Iran Hostages and their families.

What feeds the fund? Which countries does the US have sanctions against?

What is the money really used for?

Is it really going to just Iran?

Jean Murray's avatar

Thanks Mike.

They are an unscrupulous bunch of criminals.

Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Where do the criminals come from? Civilian homes and civilian bedrooms. Petroleum subsidies? Mafia. Rubbish removal? Mafia. Recycling companies and organizational constructs? Mafia. Mafia infiltration is a "thing". End of story.

Freedom Fox's avatar

This is a piece from over a decade ago. Mixed Waste Processing is what's really done across the nation. Separating trash is performative. Long ago I borrowed from David Letterman (I know, he's become rubbish) by calling recycling a "Stupid People Trick." Our tormentors laugh at us when we perform their stupid tricks like we laughed at pets.

The tell is the line from the end of this piece. They tell people to recycle just to make them *feel* like they're doing something good for their community.

Only recycle if you're okay with your performance of stupid tricks being laughed at by social engineers for their entertainment like we once laughed at Letterman's videos.

Mixed Waste Processing Facilities

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/earth-and-planetary-sciences/waste-processing

"Many still argue that sending a community’s entire waste stream without source separation lacks important public responsibility."

Note: the statistics and hand-wringing over efficiency and costs in the rest off the piece are...also rubbish. Whatever "value" is in our trash is harvested in MRF all the same as when it's separated. The additional materials 'recovered' that recycling captures are the lowest 'value' ones that don't even pay to recycle. Performative. For stupid 'pets' to feel virtuous.

Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Quoted from the opening Abstract: "It is now evident, these objectives have to be pursued continuously for *sustainable development*, to ensure adequate availability of resources for healthy living standards. [End quote]

The "sustainable development" shtick has grown almost as stale as David Letterman's monologue. None of these 'studies' recommend resource *frugality*. Just rape and pillage the planet so we can enjoy our artificial kingship... Pfffttt!

Best regards.

Freedom Fox's avatar

Yep. Thing is, when China was buying our raw 'recyclables' for processing across the ocean they soon came to realize it had so little value it didn't make economic sense to try. So they would take the cargo and just dump it while asea. Which became islands of trash in the middle of the ocean dead zones like the Sargasso Sea and would wash ashore on every beach around the world during high tides and storm surges. I've walked remote shorelines in the Caribbean and found a line of 'recyclable' trash 10-15 feet above the ordinary shoreline up and down the coast. At first thinking it was irresponsible campers or visitors from passing boats. Upon realizing the scope of it at a certain sea level I was able to put 2+2 together.

Thing is, the dumping at sea of pre-processed recyclables still continues even without China's participation. When I walk the shoreline on the east coast of the US I've come across long lines of shredded plastic bottles mixed in with seaweed and such that are the product of preprocessing plastic for easier recycle, it's put through giant metal tooth grinders and then baled for transit. Those bales are cut loose in the ocean. And when the tides shift a certain direction they wash up on the shore. It's disgusting.

But, hey, in the performance of "virtuous" deeds it's all about good intentions. When the outcomes are actually worse as a result so be it, it's the intentions that count. Cue laughter of the social engineers. At the stupid people who perform the tricks.

Paul Vonharnish's avatar

Heh... Nailed it. The North Pacific gyre is kinda like the plastic unicorn of modern convenience... Erm... "social engineers" >>> https://assets.theoceancleanup.com/app/uploads/2021/08/211008-Oceans-System-002-Trip-2-Offload-S1H-DvdK-85-1536x1024.jpg

Freedom Fox's avatar

Your first comment started off with fingering the mafia. True in more ways than we'd like to think. Search the term "National Crime Syndicate" and you'll find reference to the mob, the Apalachin meeting. Noteworthy meeting of crime bosses that's been dramatized in movies like The Godfather and Analyze this. Despite the headlines not much ever happened to the participants.

Because too many participants were running their rackets with local, state and federal government officials themselves. Somewhere along the line the mafia merged with government. In the US, China, the entire world. Bodies like Con-gress, the UN, etc are Apalachin meetings with the façade and costumes of legitimate government. Who knows, maybe that's how it's always been since the first formal government system, the rhetoric, linguistics and symbolism of formal systems serve to provide the criminals plausibility that gain the consent of those they fleece.

Linguistics. When criminals formalize a system of theft it's called a "racket." When governments formalize a system of theft they call it an "enterprise." Like, say, a "Weather Enterprise:"

Maybe you, Mike, other readers will be interested in reading this important booklet that describes in great detail how the Social Engineers pull off the climate racket. Using narrative science, social and behavioral science (the science of propaganda/censorship) that's been integrated into natural science, climatology and meteorology in a coordinated attack to push the climate fear porn for population control agenda. It's a "Weather Enterprise " that includes the network of government agencies, private-sector companies, and academic institutions that provide weather services to the nation.

You'll even find infamous propaganda specialist Kate Starbird listed in it as a contributor. It further details how they use the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to advance climate fear porn propaganda with health regulatory powers. As well as a collection of all of the centers of power that are coordinating and collaborating with this massive psychological mind-farkery operation, i.e. enterprise, i.e, racket. That social engineers are employed to pull off, gain our consent to be fleeced:

Integrating Social and Behavioral Sciences Within the Weather Enterprise

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2018.

https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/24865/chapter/1

https://doi.org/10.17226/24865

Front Matter (You've gotta check out the names of some of these Boards and Committees that contributed - many of the racketeers!)

Summary

Ch 1 Introduction

Ch 2 The Motivation for Integrating Social and Behavioral Sciences Within the Weather Enterprise

Ch 3 Assessing the Current State of Social and Behavioral Sciences Within the Weather Enterprise

Ch 4 Social and Behavioral Sciences for Road Weather Concerns

Ch 5 Research Needs for Improving the Nation’s Weather Readiness and Advancing Fundamental Social and Behavioral Science Knowledge

Ch 6 A Framework to Sustainably Support and Effectively Use Social and Behavioral Science Research in the Weather Enterprise

Ch 7 Summary of Key Findings and Recommendations

Appendix A Integrating Social and Behavioral Sciences Within the Weather Enterprise

Appendix B Lessons from SBS Integration into the “Public Health Enterprise”

Appendix C People Who Provided Input to the Committee

Appendix D Committee Biosketches

I've seen no better single resource to putting together their operational plan and strategies in one place than this 2018 book. For those who wish to do a very deep dive. A 182-page exercise describing the imposition of stupidity masquerading as intelligence and enlightened thought on an unwitting nation.

This booklet could as well be describing sources and methods for the Recycling Racket, DEI Racket, Convid Racket, Trans Racket, BLM Racket, all of the rackets. With different sets of racketeers, though many will be found to be Racket "double-dippers."

Thumbnail Green's avatar

Spot on.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Lets name the countries and land masses that have fallen shall we?

Most of Europe and certainly England due to mass immigration facilitated by fools who

do not have a strong constitution. Canada better referred to as Chinada.

Australia. Big P, the Medical Cartel, Gubmints, and people who believe that health comes from needles. Lots of details.

If not for the strong resistance in the US the WEFers would have killed maimed and taken the wealth of all...

David Robson's avatar

I watched that video and am vehemently opposed to one of the messages it tried to get across, and I'm not referring to its valid claim that recycling of plastics is uneconomic. At one point in the video it suggested that the oil industry receives billions in subsidies from governments. That is quite simply untrue, what it receives are tax concessions like depreciation of development costs over only 5 years rather than the 25 years of the predicted project life. This woman has clearly bought into the myth of AGW due to fossil fuel emissions. What is really needed to deal with the problem of plastic waste are large scale high temperature incinerators (to preclude dioxin emissions). These can generate HP steam for power generation. And yes, I am fully aware that additional fossil fuels would be needed to achieve the high temperatures required for such a system, but since I am not in the camp that believes CO2 from fossil fuels is causing "climate change" that requirement doesn't bother me in the slightest. Steam generation incinerators are unlikely to fully recoup the capital and operating costs but at least the calorific value of the waste is recovered and the damage to the environment will be less than that caused by landfill.

Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

I agree with you entirely. We’re incapable of warming the whole world if we wanted to. CO2 in the atmosphere is almost nothing to do with our piddling contribution, is in dynamic equilibrium with dissolved carbonate in the oceans and on balance, elevation is beneficial.

I also do not believe oil and gas are the product of formerly living matter, thus not fossil, and are more likely than not in such abundance that we couldn’t exhaust it if we tried. More likely the source is methane trapped in the crust being converted to longer chain alkanes under high temperatures and pressures.

High temperature incineration of plastic wastes with the dioxin abatement measures you allude to also assists with electricity generation.

A lot of people are hooked into the anthropogenic global warming nonsense.

Truth Seeker's avatar

CO2 (high school Biology), a molecule of life. The green plants take it in

through photosynthesis produce O2. Carbon best sequestered in soil.

Demonizing this simple molecule is a bizarre psyop apparently for

social justice warriors.

GreaterIsrahell's avatar

The islands in the South Pacific are not ending up under water because Ice is melting. Fill a glass with crushed Ice, and then pour water on the ice. Watch the ice melt, and the water level stay the same.

I don't know about the rest of the world, but during the last ice age Northern Europe was covered with very thick ice. This pressed the land mass below the ice down. When the ice melted the land mass started rising. Three thousand years ago the land mass where I live was 50 meters lower than it is today. All that water has to go somewhere. This is why those islands are drowning. We are still on the way out of an ice age.

....., but I'm sure you know and understand all that.

Greetings from Norway.

Andy Maybury's avatar

You are right that when floating ice melts, the water level is unaffected. When ice that is supported out of the water, as happens in glaciers and on Antarctica, melts into the oceans, it /does/ raise the water level.

The oceans are rising at a measured rate of about 3mm per year. Certainly not the alarming rate that the AGW warriors assert but not zero either.

Interestingly, the amount of energy needed to melt the quantity of H₂O necessary to raise the oceans by the measured level is about the same as the total amount of energy used by humans during the same period. No direct link of course but interesting to see the scale.

Truth Seeker's avatar

Succinct few paragraphs. Months back had this discussion with a retired PhD in Chemistry. He wanted to school me on CO2 and "fossil" fuels. Was happy to let him dig himself into the stupid corner. In undergrad school the local community was trying to incinerate ceramic electrical insulators filled with some liquid, thus creating dioxins.

Their solution? Build a higher smokestack.

David Robson's avatar

Thanks for the response. I am most honoured.

GreaterIsrahell's avatar

"I also do not believe oil and gas are the product of formerly living matter, thus not fossil, and are more likely than not in such abundance that we couldn’t exhaust it if we tried."

Exactly! How many living creatures were there below a hundred meters of water, and then several hundred additional meters below the sea bed?

The oil company executives have been very creative.

Moorea Maguire's avatar

So many parallels to the vaccination ritual. Fortunately, around the age of 24, I had enough brain cells to stop thinking that getting vaccines was a responsible, altruistic act.

Brilliant video! I'd encourage people to watch all the way through, as the best moments are near the end.

MissLadyK's avatar

My recycling bin has sat empty for years. Anything to make a buck for a power structure designed to make fools of their citizens.

Brandon is not your bro's avatar

Same

Questions questions questions's avatar

Keeps the population complying with smaller issues, so that they're too dumbed down to complain about the real ones, vaccine fraud, depopulation agendas, grooming gangs and the vile school curriculum our most vulnerable are being subjected to. And those 5G towers.

Fager 132's avatar

“What else have these crooks been lying to me about?”

I already hated the government in 2020, but "covid" really made me look around and ask that question. Answer: Everything.

Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

Yes, I’m there, too. Many people object, saying that uncovering one fraud doesn’t necessarily mean “everything is a lie”.

Actually, I think it does. I need to make clear that they obviously don’t lie anything like so much about things which ordinary people can easily check. But if you can’t check it, because it’s too small, too far away or too complicated, then we are lied to.

The logical argument goes like this.

Lying about infectious diseases, pandemics, restrictions and injections collectively demonstrates an utterly ghoulish disregard for human wellbeing and even life. Additionally, they are at best indifferent to our suffering.

Given this backdrop, let’s consider any other matter of at least moderate significance to almost everyone.

We could be told the truth about this matter. However, it’s inconceivable that tweaking the narrative would not be more favourable to someone in the power matrix. So they’re definitely going to lie.

We know that mainstream media was entirely content to lie to their trusting audiences.

I can’t craft a rationale under which the government would tell the truth about something we couldn’t check. Why would they?

Fager 132's avatar

Yes, exactly: The fact that governments and government-adjacent organizations lied so egregiously in 2020, and the fact that they've been lying about disease and "vaccines" for over a century, points to a pathological hatred of human life. Which in turn points to contempt for reality and the human mind, which means no moral compass and therefore a default to lying. Anyone who assumes that the worthless pricks would ever tell the truth is risking his health and freedom. In the absence of incontrovertible proof I don't know why anyone would even suspect them of not lying.

Sara's avatar

Many, myself included, have come to the conclusion we are "governed" by psychopaths.

They need to be locked up somewhere because they are a danger to life and cannot be trusted. .

GreaterIsrahell's avatar

Psychopathy is a prerequisite for gaining access to power.

Kenneth J Hinnenkamp's avatar

If NASA lied to us about the moon landings, which is obvious when looking back on them, can we trust anything NASA tells us?

Truth Seeker's avatar

Lied to about the most important things and trained to repeat the lies as a deliberate

requisite of advancing in formal education. There is an increasing % that has come forward. The sanctity of the question remains unscathed.

Erin J. Morgart's avatar

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Kenneth J Hinnenkamp's avatar

Fager, we are lied to about everything. The Holocaust narrative is force fed to us. It is required learning for school children in 25 states, yet there is not one iota of forensic evidence for it to be found.

Fager 132's avatar

I'm going to say this so my silence isn't taken for agreement, but I'm not debating it in this forum: I disagree.

KC & the Sunshine's avatar

The holocaust happened. We had a dear friend who very much lived through it, concentration camp and all. She was very open about it and cried every time she spoke of it. Her tattoo was real. Her memories were real. Her pain was real.

Kenneth J Hinnenkamp's avatar

If the camps were death camps, why did she survive?

Because they were work camps. She may not have had a good experience, but she survived because they were not death camps.

Many suffered pain during WWII. Jews have no right to claim they were harmed more than others. Forensic evidence does not support their claims. If you are emotionally attached to the fraudulent claims, that is your problem. We should not be forcing children to believe the Holocaust narrative.

https://archive.org/details/fc7xD4Wlo3xf

Bill Poindexter's avatar

Hey, I thought you might like this. I had a epiphany the other day, doesn’t have anything to do with recycling, but it’s very similar to how people reacted to me when I wouldn’t get the vaccine, and I was attacked on many fronts, and as much as I shared information like from you from a bunch of other people and organizations on the dangers of vaccines… They still attacked me, now I’m having the same thing happen to me because I’m anti-Zionist, especially with this idiots war in Iran, and I have all these Christian friends who are just completely brainwashed by their pastors that the government of Israel is all good, and it’s their destiny to build a new temple so the Messiah will come, and that it’s OK to kill the Palestinians, bomb away one pastor said.

Good friends of mine are just so brainwashed that I’ve had to separate the friendship because they just won’t have an open mind. It’s crazy.

Terry's avatar

The Jews say they are God's chosen people, but who is their God? "Most Jews do not like to admit it, but our God is Lucifer..... and we are his chosen people." ~ Harold Wallace Rosenthal.

Sara's avatar

If haven't come across this channel I highly recommend tuning into The Fifth Kind there are many discussions with Mauro Biglino the Vatican Translator who has been translating the Bible.

It makes perfect sense to me.

Anna's avatar

Don't even attempt to wake those who refuse to see. The Bible was one of the earliest tools used to shape and control mass belief. You either recognise its intent, or you don't - and once you do, it's impossible to ignore.

Lawrie's avatar

Brainwashing a person puts them in a strange kind of comfort zone and if it's challenged, the very act of trying to break through that wall will result in discomfort, irritation and often anger. They will of course, try to counter what you say by parroting what they've read or heard, usually acting as if they've somehow gained the knowledge by careful research. I had a 'climate' discussion with a friend recently and he theatrically consulted Google with his echo chamber results suggesting I was wrong. He's a hard nut to crack!

Sara's avatar

That says to me there are a significant number of people who are easily brain washed and obedient though to be fair I think that deflection to attacking regarding Zionism is another example of that same brainwashing. These things are a handy tool for those who can't face the reality of what has been done to them.

One would have thought they would be searching for things they could take to detoxify themselves as there are things out there to do that and plenty of information on the whole scamdemic.

Everything is down to personal responsibility across the board and not giving your power away to any outside agent especially government/corporations

Personal responsibility has been brainwashed away also unfortunately, now we all are living through the result!

Suavek's avatar

I learned about the recycling scam back in 1989 in West Germany from a very clever, older architect. This means that the entire "green movement" was a top-down hoax. Presumably, the intention was to raise our awareness of environmental problems in order to present the "climate change" agenda more credibly.

Susie's avatar

That was a very wise architect.

Questions questions questions's avatar

Issues about medicines/health, climate change/green hoax and fossil fuels/limited supply were all considered very difficult for the public to argue against while filling the pockets of the perpetrators. This was designed.

AmericaWeeps's avatar

I realized recycling was a massive con over 20 years ago. I called my trash service and told them to take away my recycling bin. They charged me a monthly fee NOT to recycle! I happily paid it. I refuse to buy into their delusion.

J. P. Bruce's avatar

If you want to experience the 'recycling' scam in its full Orwellian 'glory', come to Ireland.

The bin companies now photograph our rubbish and let us know if they find anything in the 'wrong' bin. So your solution wouldn't work here I'm afraid!

Susie's avatar

That must be an odd job to have - taking pictures of people's garbage.

Hesperado's avatar

Sounds like the job of the paparazzi…

Rosy Moonrise's avatar

I agree with you. But I still recycle because in my county it costs $30 a month for a private company to come get our trash, but I can take my stuff to the recycle bins for free. This way I end up with just a small partially filled bag of trash each week that I can put into someone else's trash can for picking up. I do it with permission of course, they don't mind because it's such a tiny bit. So for me, I'm saving $360 a year by "recycling".

Elusive1's avatar

In my midwestern state, we must pay if we wish to "recycle" every week. No thanks. I put it all in the trash bin. It all goes to the same place anyway. 😡

Thank you Michael!

Trevor John's avatar

Thanks for sharing Mike…..this will be doing the rounds

It’s amazing how successfully they have weaponised people’s willingness to virtue signal

I guess the need to virtue signal is a consequence of having an abusive relationship with the overlords

Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

Also, someone else pointed out that, if it doesn’t seem to be working & things are getting “more polluted” or whatever, then it’s YOUR FAULT (we little people). We didn’t wash enough yoghurt pots. And now look at what we’ve done.

Clever psychology.

Trevor John's avatar

Classic inversion

Craig's avatar

Don't underestimate people's desire to feel guilty.

Terry's avatar

Too true Mike. I only recycle if my main bin is full. It never ceases to amaze me that some people think its saving the planet, to wash up old jars and bottles using water (hot) and soap in order that it will get crushed and burned. Worse still, shipped 000s of miles to a third world country. We have no hope of turning round this level of gaslighting and idiocy.

Susie's avatar

Three years ago when I bought a house in this community, the former owner had left their blue bin for recycling in the yard. Neighbors each had their own bin.

I called the phone number for the city department that was shown on the bin and asked "Where does all the recycling go? My son says it goes to China". The city employee put me on hold.

When he came back he said that it doesn't go to China anymore but he would have to look into it further and call me back with an answer.

I told him I didn't need a call back.

I rolled that blue bin to the dumpster area in case someone else wanted it. I sure wasn't going to waste my valuable time sorting garbage every day!