Born to lose
The EV market is clearly set up to fail and drag the whole private transport industry with it
Today’s mini essay focuses on battery electric vehicles.
I’m no expert on automotive manufacturing but I’ve always been a “petrol head” who tinkers mechanically with older vehicles.
Herewith my thoughts on what’s happening to BEV mass manufacturing in Europe. I have no insights on what is happening elsewhere such as southwest Asia and USA.
It was written as a response to a video suggesting Mercedes have made “mistakes”.
As in so many areas, contrary to the (engineered) belief of so many the truth is:
Mistakes Were Not Made
We are being driven somewhere. The driver’s seat is not an option for us. We are told.
Best wishes
Mike
The con
I don’t think there is an EV market of any great size. It’s possible that the limited, genuine market needs have already largely been satisfied.
In U.K. at least, virtually all BEV sales are to business customers, not private, because the tax breaks strongly favour this option.
Most company car drivers don’t want an EV but corporate has deemed that EV is their only option. As a result, there’s virtually no used demand and such vehicles go into free fall upon the ending of the lease.
They’re inherently such a poor fit to the normal lives of so many people that this cannot really much change, at least not for decades. Our entire civilisation is based on practical, affordable travel in private vehicles (exceptions: those who live and work inside large cities like London and Paris).
Promises of rapid, revolutionary progress are false. We already know a great deal about the various battery chemistry choices available. Many had their basic electrochemistry evaluated decades ago. Sure, there are designs which tolerate or accept faster charging rates, but these are inherently less stable and thus more likely to catch fire.
Batteries with very low risk of thermal runaway have lower maximum capacities for a given mass and also charge more slowly, as well as providing a lower range, both axiomatically.
The solution space is already known.
There isn’t ever going to be a fire risk (almost) free design, which also provides long range and fast charging capabilities. Those requirements are not simultaneously available in a BEV.
“You cannae change the laws of physics”,
or of chemistry.
Worse, even if fantasy advances in battery technology were to prove feasible, against my understanding from electrochemists working in automotive, the mains electricity grid is irredeemably inadequate to permit fast charging - or indeed charging at all - for a high proportion of car owners.
Even if that wasn’t the unfixable problem that it is, nations in any case are generating far too little electrical power to meet the implied very large increase. U.K. generates something like 15% less electricity now compared with its peak.
If you attempt to substitute even a small fraction of the energy currently met by liquid fuels, the requirements for electrical power generation are enormously greater than our recent numbers and especially our trajectory.
That’s yet another data point that proves they are absolutely aware of how this is all going to play out.
For several reasons, Mr Toyoda, chairman of Toyota, has several times stated that he sees the maximum proportion of cars being BEVs plateauing at around the 20% mark.
Permanently.
I think there’s a genuine use case for some small proportion of the “national fleet” of cars.
U.K. government policy however is set in such a way that, inevitably, the internal combustion car industrial sector in Europe is going to die, in the sense that multiple, huge corporate groups are going to have to enter administration and if they re-emerge, they will have annual unit capacity very much reduced compared with today.
Chinese manufacturers plus Tesla will probably eat the lunch of all the other company’s BEV divisions, because the latter cannot sell enough units at a high enough price point to be able to maintain anything like the capacity they’ve built of late. Volkswagen Audi Group has debts approaching a trillion Euros (I think....it’s the second biggest corporate debt on planet earth, not just in automotive but across all sectors).
The more conspiratorially-minded among us (I’m certainly a pattern recognitionist!) think that the boards of directors of these huge automotive corporations know exactly what they’re doing. It’s naive in my opinion to blame the outcomes on incompetence. Car companies have been around mass production and addressing every need, in balance, while just about remaining profitable, for many decades. If interested people like me, and several others who are close watchers of this important industrial sector, could easily see disasters that are many BEVs, years before they hit the bottom line, it’s wholly implausible that those at the heart of those companies didn’t know it, too.
I think the most likely explanation for the dire straits in which much of European automotive mass manufacturing finds itself is that those running these large groups made it happen.
Now, at least some of you will be incredulous and apt to dismiss even the possibility.
I do understand that response. However, if you knew, as I do, how influential the World Economic Forum is in shaping numerous, important aspects of our lives and that all the major corporations are partners & even sponsors of WEF, visible leaders of The Great Reset, it becomes easier to see some of the steps in the ballet.
Those running these companies are employees. They’re not the owners or persons of significant control. The wealthiest people in the world are engaged in establishing a new world order of digital, totalitarian control.
They don’t want us in BEVs. They don’t want us travelling at all, in the way we have for the last half century and more. If you take another look at the BEV push as less about transitioning to BEVs and more about depriving what they call “the useless eaters” of owning a liquid powered vehicle of any kind, you may find it more plausible that boards have taken their marching orders from WEF associated stakeholders.
Buy at least one, hyper reliable, manual, petrol engined car that was designed at latest in the early years of this century, leaning towards the newest examples of relatively uncomplicated technology, and choosing only from models made in their millions, and you contribute to frustrating that control agenda.
Or, just decide to ignore all the obvious contradictions and keep driving late models on finance.
Paid subs go to Tim. Suavek s publication considered an essential subscription - a continuous source of Mike’s words.
Check this new series out!




Hi Mike. Briefly I would like to just introduce myself my name is Brad. I live in Ontario Canada and drive a semi truck as my career contribution to the slave system, LOL. Anyways I just wanted to give you my two cents on what I believe is happening based on my review of an owner's manual of a Tesla vehicle a few months back it's funny that your essay here kind of touches on the same reason why I even thought to look into the owner's manual of one of these vehicles.
Tesla vehicles at the heart are run by an AI based operating system that is configured for self learning. And has thousands of sensors inside the interior of the vehicle. I can only assume based on what I read that all EVS are of similar design. It is my belief that the vehicles are recording our behaviors and frankly who knows what else from within the passenger compartment of the vehicle. According to the manual all of this information is live Telemetry that is sent back to Central servers over the starlink network. Every Tesla on the planet is tracked by Elon at all times. And is likely utilizing his own algorithms to compile data sets that lead to eventual action and decision making regarding the data.
And frankly like you I am a petrolhead as well and came to the truth about the oil industry a long time ago. But that would never change my love of a big block gasoline engine over some electric car that were being lied to about its background purposes. Suffice to say that in spite of my previous beliefs that Elon Musk might have been a good guy I now know that he is absolutely evil with the rest of them. And as admirable as the green movement may be by utilizing EV vehicles, the actual and absolute truth is that they are being used as weapons like the vaccine's against us under the guise of trying to help us or provide us a better life. All EVS should be destroyed immediately as well as any connected industry except maybe the batteries because the batteries might actually help save the power grid if we actually knew the electricity would be used for 100% Humane purposes but after discovering the truth about microwave radiation and directed energy weapons, electricity is no longer a divine right given to us by God, it's being used against us as well and has been for eons, we all need to try and find a way to get charged up ourselves and take back our Humanity and our neighborhoods and our families and communities
There nothing like $200/bbl oil and gas rationing like we had in the 70's to incentivize the purchase of EV's. We know the "threat of terrorism" and "Iranian nukes" is absolute nonsense. It sure looks like they are again setting the stage for behavior modification.
We should know for sure by mid- May. Each week the strait is closed we lose a day of above ground reserves. We are now down from 26 days to 22 days. If we get down to 16 or so, it will would be lowest reserves since WWII.
Reduced spring planting and lower yields due to reduced fertilizer use will trigger very high inflation. If this happens, its all on purpose.